User talk:Alex C at The Techtonics

April 2016[edit]

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "TheTechtonics", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 10:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Techtonics (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition, there are issues with your citations. All of your citations are either non-independent or non-reliable. The non-reliable is YouTube. The others all have a connection to the subject (the group's own site, their university, places/events where they've performed). To show notability Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Techtonics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TheTechtonics, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Techtonics (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition there is an issue with your citations. All of your current references are either non-reliable (YouTube), or are non-independent. If the article's subject is connected in any way to the source, that is not an independent source. (also wouldn't hurt to format them as per WP:CIT). Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage from several sources (I usually equate that with at least 3), which are independent and reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Techtonics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Techtonics (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition there is an issue with your citations. All of your current references are either non-reliable (YouTube), or are non-independent. If the article's subject is connected in any way to the source, that is not an independent source. (also wouldn't hurt to format them as per WP:CIT). Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage from several sources (I usually equate that with at least 3), which are independent and reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Techtonics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BethNaught: This account has been renamed to an acceptable name per policy. If there are no other issues, feel free to unblock it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Techtonics has been accepted[edit]

The Techtonics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Naraht (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Alex C at The Techtonics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Alex C at The Techtonics (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

This account was blocked from editing pages because the username was just 'The Techtonics', I have changed it to represent myself, as I am th publicity officer for the Tectonics. As such, I would like to edit the page to update it with what the group have been doing since 2016.

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Alex C at The Techtonics}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=Alex C at The Techtonics | 3=This account was blocked from editing pages because the username was just 'The Techtonics', I have changed it to represent myself, as I am th publicity officer for the Tectonics. As such, I would like to edit the page to update it with what the group have been doing since 2016. | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Alex C at The Techtonics | reason=This account was blocked from editing pages because the username was just 'The Techtonics', I have changed it to represent myself, as I am th publicity officer for the Tectonics. As such, I would like to edit the page to update it with what the group have been doing since 2016. | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Alex C at The Techtonics | reason=This account was blocked from editing pages because the username was just 'The Techtonics', I have changed it to represent myself, as I am th publicity officer for the Tectonics. As such, I would like to edit the page to update it with what the group have been doing since 2016. | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

It would be inappropriate of you to do so. See WP:COI and WP:PROMO. If this is your only goal here, there's no point in unblocking you. If instead you commit to publicly declaring your conflict of interest and avoiding writing about subjects for which you have a conflict of interest, I'll unblock you immediately. --Yamla (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]