User talk:Nigel Ish

Merry X'mas~!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®}is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year!

Dear Nigel Ish,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Maintenance tags

Would you be so kind to tag specific sections or sentences that are dubious in some way? before removing the tag I read the entire article and made sure that I didn’t see anything suspicious. Of course you might know more about the topic than I do and you might find some things that warrant tagging. Jehochman ^Talk

CS1 error on No. 11 Squadron RAF

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page No. 11 Squadron RAF, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:19, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Lost in ....

I have made several attempts to make "Contributions" to Wikipedia only to have them "reverted" by you. If there is a simple way to get my latest contribution recast, I would like to do that. I believe that this contribution is a significant addition to the page and Wikipedia. I offer it if it fits yours and Wikipedia's standards. Please advise me of your requirements.

12:47, 4 November 2023 diff hist +627‎ Transcendental Model 1-G ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted

Wcobey Wcobey (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Perhaps you should stop spamming your book, which appears to constitute the majority of your edits to the article.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

AMF Microflight Ltd. Chevron 2-32C

@Nigel Ish you created this page and I was wondering if you have contacts, that could possibly have access to Building plans of this plane. I need them to figure out a way of fitting a different engine. Thanks and cheers 24.206.107.71 (talk) 10:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

No - I don't gave any special contacts or connection with the design. Maybe try the https://www.lightaircraftassociation.co.uk/ - someone there might know?Nigel Ish (talk) 17:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, i will try that. 24.206.107.70 (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Ka-15 revert due to Aviastar being used

Hi Nigel Ish, I was wonder if I could keep my other sources and remove Aviastar, since I believe the rest of the Kamov Ka-15 article was fine. Forevernewyes (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Aviastar was the only source you used.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

No let me check I used other sources. Im sorry Im new to wikipedia Forevernewyes (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Yeah I must've removed my other sources, it was just aviastar, sorry for the inconvenience. Forevernewyes (talk) 18:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Could you please add one of those templates that state that a article lacks citations? I dont know how to use those. Thank you, don't mean to bug you. Forevernewyes (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for adding what I wanted to be in the article but with reliable sources, I was upset the Ka-15 didn't have much of a Wikipedia article, close to a stub almost. Forevernewyes (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Aero A.18 Source Question

I can understand removing Aviastar due to copyvio (which sucks since that site is often one of the few in English but it is what it is), but what's wrong with flugzeuginfo.net? Is it on a list of unreliable resources? Tengu99 (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

flugzeuginfo.net is a Self Published site with no evidence that it is written by an established, published expert in the field. See Wikipedia:RS/SPSNigel Ish (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)